New Badges by XPG Designs

Discussion in 'Avatars & Signatures' started by SexyDev, Dec 18, 2012.

  1. Se

    SexyDev Queen of Darkness
    155/188

    XPG Designs is here to present it's new badges.


    New Badges by XPG Designs

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Designs Originally from TheTechGame!

    Leave Feedback!
     
  2. bad1427

    bad1427 Newbie
    0/47

    makes everything easier to steal huh? other than that, not bad.
     
  3. Wallsch

    Wallsch Gold Member Gold Subscriber Lifetime Gold
    185/188

    Why would we want Anything from TTG much less badges?
     
  4. Se

    SexyDev Queen of Darkness
    0/47

    I didn't steal anything. I re created the badges, if you can read can't you see Design Originally from TheTechGame!

    Read Before Posting Please!
     
  5. Se

    SexyDev Queen of Darkness
    0/47

    Give me feedback, I didn't say anything about you guys keeping them. I re created them because I was bored. Feedback is the only thing I look for. My work is never free. Unless it's XPG.
     
  6. bad1427

    bad1427 Newbie
    0/47

    Sorry, when you said "originally" from TTG I thought you meant that they were out-dated badges that they used.
     
  7. Wallsch

    Wallsch Gold Member Gold Subscriber Lifetime Gold
    185/188

    Well It's not bad. I just thought you wanted them to be put up over current :p
     
  8. bad1427

    bad1427 Newbie
    0/47

    Will these really become the new badges?
     
  9. Wallsch

    Wallsch Gold Member Gold Subscriber Lifetime Gold
    185/188

    No.
     
  10. Se

    SexyDev Queen of Darkness
    0/47

    It's all good, and I wasn't being rude it's just that happened quite a bit recently.

    No I like the current badges on this site.

    No they won't be replacing the current badges.

    :p
     
  11. XPGCaboose

    XPGCaboose XPG Lifer TeamXPG
    155/188

    not too bad. little too simple imo but very clean. how about making all the badges the same size at least?
     

Share This Page